MSN vs Google?

This forum is for discussion of BING (formerly MSN Search or Live Search).
kimsmarkin
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:49 am
Contact:

Re: MSN vs Google?

Postby kimsmarkin » Mon Aug 30, 2010 2:44 am

I have been a fan of Goggle for years because they really provide the highest quality traffic and conversions. However, inconsistencies in their laws, the couple in support, and wish-washy guidelines were other options much more attractive.

MiselStics
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 6:57 pm
Contact:

Re: MSN vs Google?

Postby MiselStics » Wed Sep 22, 2010 6:59 pm

Google tallied 64 million unique visitors in August, with each of them staying on the site an average 25 minutes for the month

Google is NO 1

merano1
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:32 am
Contact:

Re: MSN vs Google?

Postby merano1 » Thu Sep 23, 2010 1:02 am

MSN rankings are generally faster attained on this engine and thus it is a good place to begin, especially if you have a new site that is likely still in the sandbox on Google or are jusy at the beginning stages of link building.

kellihale2041
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:14 pm
Contact:

Re: MSN vs Google?

Postby kellihale2041 » Wed Oct 06, 2010 4:00 am

MSN and Google Both are very good search engines of the world.
It is very difficult which is better.
However Msn is Better than Google. because Msn is king of all search engines.

cfoo
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: In A Gym
Contact:

Re: MSN vs Google?

Postby cfoo » Fri Oct 15, 2010 12:30 am

Google and Bing have their own advantages.

anneroberts
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:27 am
Location: Houston
Contact:

Re: MSN vs Google?

Postby anneroberts » Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:15 pm

MSN is small and weak because it doesn’t get enough pie (about 3%). It doesn’t get much pie because it sucks. MSN is the youngest of the big three engines and is still trying to figure out what people want. More accurately, they are trying to bypass what people want by using their brand name to get their foot in the door, and then hoping people will be lazy enough to just accept them as their “default search engine” when buying other Microsoft products (products like Windows and Internet Explorer). This worked for their OS, browser, and office products, but it won’t work for their search engine. People are more saavy these days. The good news is that because they are so small and insignificant there is less competition and new sites can rank well, for what it’s worth.
Google's Positives
Powers a huge amount of searches
Average Joe searcher happy with results
Incredibly fast searches
Good organic to paid result ratio
Super clean layout
'Do No Evil' reputation
Their own PPC (pay per click advertising) program
Large cash bukcet from the IPO to throw things at
Bringing 'stickyness' to the site via Gmail, Google News and Froogle
Breaking new grounds in technology and ideas to search and the internet as a whole

anneroberts
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:27 am
Location: Houston
Contact:

Re: MSN vs Google?

Postby anneroberts » Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:17 pm

MSN is small and weak because it doesn’t get enough pie (about 3%). It doesn’t get much pie because it sucks. MSN is the youngest of the big three engines and is still trying to figure out what people want. More accurately, they are trying to bypass what people want by using their brand name to get their foot in the door, and then hoping people will be lazy enough to just accept them as their “default search engine” when buying other Microsoft products (products like Windows and Internet Explorer). This worked for their OS, browser, and office products, but it won’t work for their search engine. People are more saavy these days. The good news is that because they are so small and insignificant there is less competition and new sites can rank well, for what it’s worth.
Google's Positives
Powers a huge amount of searches
Average Joe searcher happy with results
Incredibly fast searches
Good organic to paid result ratio
Super clean layout
'Do No Evil' reputation
Their own PPC (pay per click advertising) program
Large cash bukcet from the IPO to throw things at
Bringing 'stickyness' to the site via Gmail, Google News and Froogle
Breaking new grounds in technology and ideas to search and the internet as a whole

Raut1939
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 7:56 am
Contact:

Re: MSN vs Google?

Postby Raut1939 » Tue Jan 02, 2018 8:40 am

i need some more information from u :roll:

Ungs1948
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2018 8:30 am
Contact:

Re: MSN vs Google?

Postby Ungs1948 » Mon Mar 05, 2018 8:37 am

Like other communities that talks the same topic as yours and get along so you can easily introduce your page to them..

Heack1938
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2018 5:28 am
Contact:

Re: MSN vs Google?

Postby Heack1938 » Wed Mar 07, 2018 6:00 am

Bing gives utmost weight to onpage aspects such as contents and keywords. Authority and domain age also play a big role.

Deeme1938
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2018 7:19 am
Contact:

Re: MSN vs Google?

Postby Deeme1938 » Mon Mar 12, 2018 7:50 am

I think you should give some more details about this in order to get a useful response. What website, what positions etc etc?

breezer
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2018 3:25 am
Location: Mataram, Lombok
Contact:

Re: MSN vs Google?

Postby breezer » Mon Apr 23, 2018 3:18 am

So, what's the related question with your thread's title ?

Witim1957
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:14 am
Contact:

Re: MSN vs Google?

Postby Witim1957 » Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:46 am

Bing really care about title tag i think. You should optimize the website title tag...


Return to “BING (Formerly MSN Search)”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests