Page 1 of 1
Tragic death of rankings
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 10:53 pm
by Wishbone
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 10:25 am
by nadalinv
So many things in that article make no sense to me. For example, why is video automatically considered 'better' than no video? Personally, I don't like sites with video - I can't watch them at work, they don't always load, I don't want it cluttering up my screen. So why should a site with video get a higher ranking than a site without?
I think personalized search sounds goodin theory, but won't be that great in practice.
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 1:33 pm
by moo baa
That's quite worrying that's things are changing so much all the time you don't know where you are half the time.
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:06 pm
by AS-9
nadalinv wrote:So many things in that article make no sense to me. For example, why is video automatically considered 'better' than no video? Personally, I don't like sites with video - I can't watch them at work, they don't always load, I don't want it cluttering up my screen. So why should a site with video get a higher ranking than a site without?
I think personalized search sounds goodin theory, but won't be that great in practice.
Things change as time goes on and that's just what they think is what's going to happen base on some studies they conduct I believe.
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:11 am
by my_misyel
We really need to update ourselves on the latest happenings in Search Engine world.