1 relevant link to ur site is more precious than 100 others

stnnetindia · Post by **stnnetindia** » Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:05 am

hi,

Having plenty of links to my site, Google has not ranked my site.

i have put query to Google and they have replied telling that

"Even 1 relevant link to ur site is more precious than 100 junk links for site rank calcuation"

so while building links, relevancy is much more important. Building junk links may bring down ur search engine list position too...

Am i correct?

Sreejith
www.thekeralatemples.com

YooHee · Post by **YooHee** » Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:14 am

yes..... because, even though you have a thousand of un-relevant backlinks.....and only 1 or 2 are relevant..... SE will always go for the relevant backlinks

scott5430 · Post by **scott5430** » Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:19 am

although true that 1 relevant back link (from high pr site) is significantly more important than 100 "irrelevant" links... it is often 1000 times easier to get the 100 easy links.

Hydra · Post by **Hydra** » Tue Apr 07, 2009 7:12 am

scott5430 wrote:although true that 1 relevant back link (from high pr site) is significantly more important than 100 "irrelevant" links... it is often 1000 times easier to get the 100 easy links.

You can have up to 1000's irrelevant links and still won't get credit for them. Relevancy is what page rank is all about at google.

Of course those 100 links are good if you're not in a very competing niche.

chazlawyer · Post by **chazlawyer** » Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:37 pm

Does this mean that 100 non-relevant backlinks might equal one relevant link?

bleuken · Post by **bleuken** » Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:41 pm

what if you tried to make it relevant? By the way, how would they measure the relevance of a site linking to your website? Is it the density of the keywords or the presence of it that is the same or relevant to the words on your pages? Can anyone clear this up?

umeshseo · Post by **umeshseo** » Sat Apr 11, 2009 12:15 am

I agree with you junk link make down your site from Google......... And yes 1 relevant link is more precious than 100 junk site.... but also do High quality of one way directory submission........it help to your site

Rick Glaser · Post by **Rick Glaser** » Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:31 am

chazlawyer wrote:Does this mean that 100 non-relevant backlinks might equal one relevant link?

I don't think that that can even be compared. If I have a health site, that is all over every site that sells sneakers, and I have 1 link from webmd or something, I will prefer the 1 high quality relevant any day of the week over 1000 unrelated. Aside from rankings, this gives you a great chance to actually get some click throughs.

Jeperry · Post by **Jeperry** » Sun Apr 12, 2009 2:40 pm

Hi,

I think so that quality links means relevant links are more valuable than non relevant links.

Thanks

adaliacampbell · Post by **adaliacampbell** » Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:35 am

YooHee wrote:yes..... because, even though you have a thousand of un-relevant backlinks.....and only 1 or 2 are relevant..... SE will always go for the relevant backlinks

Yeah right ... 100 links from un-relevant site and just one link from relevant site

mwya · Post by **mwya** » Mon Apr 13, 2009 4:50 am

quality link which we called in search engines optimization weighted backlink which is very very important in pushing your site to the top search engines
thanks

sjenkins · Post by **sjenkins** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:56 am

But its so hard to find a relative link for something that is at the corner stone of SPAM - Online Pharamacy ( a word i cannot spell right because its on this forums SPAM WORDS list

)

90% of them are SCAMS or ILLEGAL.. how does a legit one make its way in the world with that kinda of publicity

sonic333 · Post by **sonic333** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:53 am

jj1 wrote:
Building junk links may bring down ur search engine list position too...
I've always beleived that there was nothing your competition could do to bring down your site - therefore - as there is nothing stopping a competitor building 1000s of junk links to your site - I thought that Google would simply ingore these links or give you only a small amount of credit) rather than penalising you. Of course, the links you have going out from your site are a different matter ...
Also, some junk links make your link building process look "natural".

this is how I feel it wouldn't make sense for them to penalize you for who's linking to you, you get penalized for who you link to not the other way around.

sneakerstudio · Post by **sneakerstudio** » Fri Sep 01, 2017 9:44 am

OK, do you have some guide as to how to build relevant links?

For instance, if I place here a link to a sneakers online shop - https://sneakerstudio.com/ - there it is - I doubt it's gonna be relevantm right?

techpally · Post by **techpally** » Sat Sep 02, 2017 4:13 am

stnnetindia wrote:hi,

Having plenty of links to my site, Google has not ranked my site.

i have put query to Google and they have replied telling that

"Even 1 relevant link to ur site is more precious than 100 junk links for site rank calcuation"

so while building links, relevancy is much more important. Building junk links may bring down ur search engine list position too...

Am i correct?

Sreejith

Google have changed from quantity to quality for long. So, quality contents and quality backlinks are the secrets of higher ranking

Search Engine Forums, SEO Forum

1 relevant link to ur site is more precious than 100 others

1 relevant link to ur site is more precious than 100 others

Re: 1 relevant link to ur site is more precious than 100 others

Re: 1 relevant link to ur site is more precious than 100 others

Who is online